12 Responses

  1. Kate
    Kate August 19, 2008 at 3:12 pm |

    Meh – the new logo is a step back. The old one looked far more professional, now it looks kind of amaturish.

    Reply
  2. BenMVP
    BenMVP August 19, 2008 at 3:53 pm |

    If you add “?zbar=true” to your links to your gallery then you’ll get a much shorter header w/o the “leaks”

    Reply
  3. Adam
    Adam August 19, 2008 at 7:11 pm |

    * Shaking my head. That search bar is irking me every time I open up my Gallery.

    I liked their previous logo too – it said Zazzle to me. I was more aware of the brand by looking at it.. now I’m not getting as much back.

    Reply
  4. Debbi
    Debbi August 20, 2008 at 1:24 am |

    I agree with all the points in your post.

    I liked the old logo beter too. I agree it was much more professional looking and not as intrusive. I feel like the new branding focuses more on the Zazzle identity than making my content take center stage. :-(

    I’m really hating the new search bar.

    Reply
  5. Kelly
    Kelly August 20, 2008 at 6:36 am |

    Posting this on GG, but doesn’t the new logo remind you of the old “nytol” commercials.. where the pill is an N and turns over into a Z? I swear it reminds me of that!

    Another thing that irks me about the ‘it’s about you..’, the main page is created so that your eye is drawn to ‘create your own’ stuff and ‘sell’ your stuff, I didn’t even notice where you can search and BUY stuff until I looked a little harder.. they do not draw a lot of attention to it at all.

    Reply
  6. BenMVP
    BenMVP August 20, 2008 at 9:32 am |

    @RudeRetro – the new zbar that I was talking about is explained in the Zazzle forum: http://forum.zazzle.com/feedback/introducing_the_zazzle_zbar. There is sometimes some weirdness when I have my ZoneAlarm settings too restrictive, but it usually works fine for me.

    Maybe you ran into the bug they described?

    Reply
  7. Adam
    Adam August 20, 2008 at 4:28 pm |

    Zazzle just don’t get it do they.

    Reply
  8. Jim
    Jim August 20, 2008 at 5:39 pm |

    I’m assuming that the fact that they say it’s “FREE to contributors” is implying that other sites charge for this sort of functionality?

    Reply

Leave a Reply